Anesthesia Accident Lawyer
Hawaii Personal injury lawyer
Keywords: attorney, law, lawyer, Hawaii, Honolulu, Oahu, Maui, Big Island, Kauai, malpractice, anesthesia, anesthetic, anesthetist, anesthesiologist, professional, negligence, Hawaii, Honolulu, accident, attorney, lawyer, anesthesia, anesthetic, anesthetist, anesthesiologist, professional, negligence, doctor
William H. Lawson, Attorney at Law
1188 Bishop St.
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Phone: (808) 524-5300 New Client Hotline
Phone: (808) 528-2525 Main Business Line
The Deadline to File an Anesthesia Malpractice Claim
The deadline for filing most medical malpractice claims in court in Hawaii is two (2) years from the date when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the negligence of the medical care provider and that injuries resulted therefrom. It is not necessary for an expert to advise the injured party that there was professional negligence which caused the injuries before the statute of limitations will start running. It is sufficient to start the running of the 2 year period, if the injured parties have knowledge of the facts which establish an actionable claim. Buck v. Miles, Hawaii Sup. Ct. No. 20368 (Jan. 25, 1999). Some statutes appear to indicate that there is also a maximum limit of six (6) years from the date of the alleged negligence in which to file an anesthesia malpractice claim.
Anesthesia claim information
Anesthetized Patients require continuous
monitoring during surgery
The anesthetized patient has a loss of bodily sensation- frequently accompanied with a loss of consciousness- during surgery. Under such circumstances the patient undergoing a surgery has given up responsibility for his health- and often even for his very survival- to the vigilance and skill of his physicians. The anesthesiologist is responsible for monitoring the progress of the surgery. Proper monitoring can provide early warnings of adverse changes during the surgery so that injury and/or death can be prevented.
The American Society of Anesthesiologists has promulgated uniform standards for the administration of anesthesia. Standard I requires that qualified anesthesia personnel shall be present at all times during the procedure requiring anesthesia. Standard II requires that the anesthesiologist continuously evaluate the patient's oxygenation, ventilation, circulation, and temperature.
To ensure adequate oxygen concentration in the blood during all anesthestics, the "concentration of oxygen in the patient breathing system shall be measured by an oxygen analyzer with a low oxygen concentraion limit alarm in use." In measuring blood oxygenation "a quantitative method of assessing oxygenation such as pulse oximetry shall be employed."
To ensure adequate ventilation of the patient, every patient shall have the adequacy of the ventilation continually evaluated. While reliance may be placed on qualitative clinical signs such as chest expansion, observation of the reservoir breathing bag, and auscultation of breath sounds, quantitative monitoring of the CO2 content and or volume of expired gas is encouraged. When an endotracheal tube is used, the anesthesiologist must verify its correct positioning in the trachea and identify carbon dioxide in the expired gas. When ventilation is controlled by a mechanical ventilator, the device capable of detecting any disconnection or malfunction of the components of the breathing system. The device should also be designed to give an audible alarm whenever a disconnection or a malfunction is detected.
To ensure that the patient's circulation remains adequate during the procedure, every patient shall have an electrocardiogram which continuously displays circulatory function during the entire operative procedure. Blood pressure and heart rate shall be evaluated at least every 5 minutes. In addition to the above, circulatory function shall also be continually evaluated by pulse measurements and heart sounds.
In order to assure appropriate body temperatures throughout the procedure, there shall be means readily available for measuring the patient's temperature.
A complete anesthesia record must be created during the operation for medical and legal purposes. The record must be made contemporaneously and continuously. The record must provide a detailed account of what took place during the course of the treatment and management of the patient. The anesthesia record includes recording fluid and blood replacement, estimated blood loss, urinary output, body temperaure, ECG findings, endtidal PCO2, arterial blood gases, central venous pressure and vital signs. While patient care takes precedence over record keeping, every effort shoud be made to keep the anesthesia record as current as possible. Information recorded only on the basis of the anesthesiologists's memory is suspect.
There are numerous complications that can occur during anesthesia. Problems may arise during intubation of the trachea, while the tracheal tube is in place or after its removal. Problems may result from the body's rejection of the procedure, from improper administration of the procedure or from a combination of both.
The anesthetized patient is in the hands of his physicians. In order for the procedure to be completed successfully, the anesthesiologist must
montitor the patient's oxygenation, ventilation, circulation and temperature. A record of the procedure must be kept and provides extremely valuable information to review and analyze to understand any problems which may occur with an anesthetized patient.
- If you believe that you may have a claim of this type, please take a few moments to visit with a paralegal to outline the nature of your claim. Thank you!
Explore this site:
Hawaii Personal Injury and Accident Law News and Cases
On June 29, 2015, the Hawaii Supreme Court rendered its decision in the case of St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, Hi. Sup. Ct. Case No SCCQ-14-0000727 (June 29, 2015). This case arose out of a wrongful death personal injury case handled by this office which resulted in a $4.1 million verdict in favor of our clients - even though Liberty Mutual, the primary liability insurer, never offered anything even close to its policy limits of $1 million. St. Paul - who had to pay our clients everything recovered in excess of the initial $1 million - claimed that Liberty Mutual committed bad faith towards it by failing to settle within its $1 million policy limits. The Hawaii Supreme Court agreed and found that an excess insurer has claims for bad faith against a primary insurer.